| vs its (71-27) | |
|
+13sl1p kyzer blend Dark*E hect1c zypher Clix amAze wangiz Fenix p1x3L Calie ReAper 17 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
hect1c
Posts : 231 Join date : 2010-08-02 Age : 33
| |
| |
ReAper Admin
Posts : 470 Join date : 2009-12-02 Age : 40 Location : Pennsylvania
| |
| |
hect1c
Posts : 231 Join date : 2010-08-02 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Sat Oct 02, 2010 5:32 am | |
| | |
|
| |
hect1c
Posts : 231 Join date : 2010-08-02 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Sat Oct 02, 2010 2:01 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
hect1c
Posts : 231 Join date : 2010-08-02 Age : 33
| |
| |
hect1c
Posts : 231 Join date : 2010-08-02 Age : 33
| |
| |
hect1c
Posts : 231 Join date : 2010-08-02 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Thu Oct 14, 2010 12:39 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
hect1c
Posts : 231 Join date : 2010-08-02 Age : 33
| |
| |
hect1c
Posts : 231 Join date : 2010-08-02 Age : 33
| |
| |
kyzer
Posts : 95 Join date : 2010-08-03
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:11 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
kyzer
Posts : 95 Join date : 2010-08-03
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:26 pm | |
| gotta get used to our server settings lol,feels trange | |
|
| |
ReAper Admin
Posts : 470 Join date : 2009-12-02 Age : 40 Location : Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:12 pm | |
| Was a good game till someone had to be a nub... In all honesty though, I'd probably rage too if I was getting raped by people who hardly even play this game still. Nice game you inactive foq'rs! p.s. makes you wonder what the score would be if we actually gave a shit
Last edited by ReAper on Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:15 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
kyzer
Posts : 95 Join date : 2010-08-03
| |
| |
ReAper Admin
Posts : 470 Join date : 2009-12-02 Age : 40 Location : Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:15 pm | |
| I guess you could say you "unleashed" a "wonderful" pummel to finish it? F R E AK I N A W E S O M E | |
|
| |
kyzer
Posts : 95 Join date : 2010-08-03
| |
| |
ReAper Admin
Posts : 470 Join date : 2009-12-02 Age : 40 Location : Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:25 pm | |
| I'm so proud of void *fights back the tears* gg's guys | |
|
| |
sl1p
Posts : 23 Join date : 2010-10-07
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:34 am | |
| gg | |
|
| |
hect1c
Posts : 231 Join date : 2010-08-02 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:24 pm | |
| also played another two (won 1 lost 1), gg's | |
|
| |
kyzer
Posts : 95 Join date : 2010-08-03
| |
| |
ReAper Admin
Posts : 470 Join date : 2009-12-02 Age : 40 Location : Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:04 pm | |
| fuck this server kyzer bullshit such a friendly bunch! | |
|
| |
ReAper Admin
Posts : 470 Join date : 2009-12-02 Age : 40 Location : Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:37 pm | |
| After a member of its requested that we "fix" our tdm cfg and demonstrated how strongly he wanted this by crying/raging as a dm13 match begun tonight I've decided, with much reluctance, to make some changes to our cfg... Like the new welcome message? Truthfully, if you have played Q3 Noghost for more than a few months and don't know how to simply COVER YOUR OWN STUPID ASS when it's time for respawns your dumbass deserves to be frozen for a round. Sorry if most servers turning to the soft Dallas Noghost spawn protection over the years has turned some people into mindless noobs used to having a second chance when they get shot in the butt during respawn. Ironically enough the clan that hosted that server left their scrim server with this same type of protection; spawning team only had protection. The 2-way protection was always intended for crowded/nooby public rail freeze, even eRa knew that. If you can't suck it up and play a game or two now and then with our settings don't be shocked if your left with nothing to do but go back to UE forum and beg some more to scrim them. God Bless Quake 3.
Last edited by ReAper on Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:40 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
Anthem
Posts : 2 Join date : 2010-08-12
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:39 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Fenix
Posts : 179 Join date : 2009-12-11
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Sat Oct 30, 2010 4:42 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Katara
Posts : 26 Join date : 2010-08-12
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:32 pm | |
| - Fenix wrote:
- Anthem wrote:
- Win.
| |
|
| |
Katara
Posts : 26 Join date : 2010-08-12
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:41 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: vs its (71-27) | |
| |
|
| |
| vs its (71-27) | |
|